{"id":3571,"date":"2026-06-25T18:05:40","date_gmt":"2026-06-25T18:05:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/bostonrelocationinsider.com\/?p=3571"},"modified":"2026-06-25T18:05:40","modified_gmt":"2026-06-25T18:05:40","slug":"more-people-will-die-read-justice-sotomayors-blistering-dissent-in-supreme-courts-decision-on-asylum-seekers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bostonrelocationinsider.com\/?p=3571","title":{"rendered":"\u2018More people will die\u2019: Read Justice Sotomayor\u2019s blistering dissent in Supreme Court\u2019s decision on asylum seekers"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

The Supreme Court\u2019s 6-3 conservative majority handed the Trump administration yet another win in the president\u2019s efforts to crackdown on immigration.<\/span><\/p>\n

Read more R.I. Governor Dan McKee vetoes bill requiring energy reports for big buildings<\/a><\/p>\n

Justices ruled on Thursday to clear the way for the Trump administration to restore a policy of limiting the number of people who can apply for asylum each day, overturning a lower court order blocking its use. It had previously been deployed by both the Obama and Trump administrations to turn back migrants seeking asylum at the US-Mexico border. The decision gives President Trump the chance to go back to the previous policyas he seeks to curb immigration into the US.<\/span><\/p>\n

, Justice Samuel Alito, a Bush-appointee, said in part that the case hinges on the \u201cordinary meaning\u201d of if someone \u201carrives in the United States.\u201d The Justice Department had argued that people stopped by authorities along the US border haven\u2019t yet arrived in the country, so immigration agents don\u2019t have to let them apply for asylum under federal law. <\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
Get Starting Point<\/span><\/div>\n
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.<\/span><\/div>\n
\n